Larger Bore, Shallower Mouthpiece
Forum rules
This section is for posts that are directly related to performance, performers, or equipment. Social issues are allowed, as long as they are directly related to those categories. If you see a post that you cannot respond to with respect and courtesy, we ask that you do not respond at all.
This section is for posts that are directly related to performance, performers, or equipment. Social issues are allowed, as long as they are directly related to those categories. If you see a post that you cannot respond to with respect and courtesy, we ask that you do not respond at all.
-
Mary Ann
- Posts: 3045
- Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 9:24 am
- Has thanked: 522 times
- Been thanked: 599 times
Re: Larger Bore, Shallower Mouthpiece
What I have noticed with a more shallow cup is that I don't have to anticipate nearly as much....I get behind the beat with a funnel. And I notice a difference in timbre but not intonation.
-
bloke
- Mid South Music
- Posts: 19421
- Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 8:55 am
- Location: western Tennessee - near Memphis
- Has thanked: 3876 times
- Been thanked: 4140 times
Re: Larger Bore, Shallower Mouthpiece
I don’t like wonky geeky posts, but here’s one anyway:Doc wrote: ↑Wed Dec 23, 2020 4:41 pmIt’s not as bowl shaped, as deep, or as voluminous as the Symphony. I think (IIRC), the Imperial, while not a funnel a la Helleberg, it is the most funnel-ish mp in the line-up.
By the time you add a 3mm tall cylinder to the top of an Imperial cup (which does make a good mouthpiece by the way), there’s probably more volume in that cup than in a regular Sell’bgr Symphony cup...though the sonority is still going to be a bit more brilliant than with a Symphony cup.