To make a weak attempt to answer your question (my poor grasp on this subject notwithstanding), in practical terms (which is the only experience I have), I’ve yet to encounter a situation where I’m building a horn that isn’t more than 2 to 4 inches off (usually trending closer to the larger number) of the nominal “target” length, meaning, on a BBb tuba = 216”, or on a CC tuba = 192” (for example, the before mentioned BBb tuba I’m building plays in tune at @214.25” - I’ll be building it to @212”, which is 4” off the nominal measurement of 216”).Tubajug wrote: ↑Wed Apr 28, 2021 7:44 pmI'm jumping in here trying to understand a bit of this as well.UncleBeer wrote: ↑Wed Apr 28, 2021 11:32 amThat's my understanding of all this.Yorkboy wrote: ↑Wed Apr 28, 2021 7:35 am This particular instrument plays in tune at a length of 214.25”; with an 18.5” bell, this would mean that the acoustical length of the horn would actually be over 225 inches - (9.25” x .61) x 2 = 11.28” - could this be possible if there’s an end effect that adds almost a foot of length?
So for simplicity's sake, let's go with the 16 foot length of a CC tuba (192 inches). If it's got a 20" bell (which the one I'd like to build actually does...), the bugle itself only needs to be about 180 inches long to account for that 12 inches of end effect?
That would actually help me a lot since I'm cutting a BBb bugle. That would mean a good deal less tubing to cut (12 inches vs. a full 24).
(This takes into account you don’t want to build a horn that is perfectly in tune with the MTS pushed all the way in......there needs to be a few inches of leeway subtracted to push the slide in further to accommodate when you are playing flat, such as colder temperatures, etc., hence the @ 212” figure.)
How the end effect factors in to all of this, in light of my personal experience, still eludes me.