https://newlondon.craigslist.org/msg/d/ ... 55025.html
![Image](https://i.imgur.com/uOHEOWbl.jpg)
Either that or the excessive weight made it an unreasonable option for many people. Especially if a 10-pound lighter tuba also played better.
I'm not suggesting that anything similar could be found for 10 lbs less, but if this thing weighs 30 lbs, then a Miraphone 186 may not be too far off from 10 lbs less? Totally different, sure... but maybe that's a good thing.donn wrote: ↑Tue May 30, 2023 1:14 am I doubt it. They were immensely popular, and while playing characteristics may have varied with factory successes and failures, the weight's the same. And I doubt you'd get anything remotely similar for 10 lbs less. According to weights published on another tuba player forum site, this would be about the same as a MW Thor for example. A Cerveny might come close - thin brass and less bell flare - but the two aren't exactly interchangeable.