1933 large bore King + 1926 Buescher (19" recording bell)
- arpthark
- Posts: 3976
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2020 4:25 pm
- Location: Southeastern Connecticut
- Has thanked: 966 times
- Been thanked: 1094 times
- Contact:
1933 large bore King + 1926 Buescher (19" recording bell)
After driving all over creation yesterday (well, all over Massachusetts, which has enough traffic for the rest of creation), I picked up these two silver, interwar-era, MTS-before-the-valvesets, recording bell, front-action, three-valve B-flats.
First is a ~1933 pre-1240 model King with a large bore of approx. .750". It has a 21.5" recording bell, pristine valves, and a botched receiver/brace repair. Despite that, it's a great player. I eventually unwrapped the electrical tape on the first valve circuit, fearing a hole, but I think it was just put there for comfort or protection, like a leather wrap. Valves show virtually no plating wear and all tuning slides move, but there is a fair bit of lime buildup, and I still need to get the bottom caps off.
Note that unlike a 1240, which is it very similar to otherwise, it has the tuning slide before the valveset. The angle of the recording bell is also a bit more forward-facing by a few degrees.
(I actually have a mid-1960s King 1240 here as well, and I'll make another post about the differences.)
(^^ I love this brace, for some reason.)
(^^ solder glob city, plus a broken brace)
Next up is a 1926 Buescher with a single MTS before the valves and a 19" recording bell. This thing is in great shape! A few dings and dents, and someone got creative with reattaching the lyre holder, but all slides work, including the goofy extra loop in the 3rd valve tubing that has a tiny slide in it. The valves on this one aren't as good, with a little bit more wear, but slides all still have pretty good pop. I was interested in how LONG this recording bell is. It's also one of the smallest recording bells I've seen, but I know Buescher made smaller ones. Reminds me of a phonograph bell or something. It's a good player. The bell needs a bit of straightening out, but the body is in great shape with no busted braces or anything.
(^^ nice repair to the lyre holder)
Here they are side-by-side:
Cool tubas!
First is a ~1933 pre-1240 model King with a large bore of approx. .750". It has a 21.5" recording bell, pristine valves, and a botched receiver/brace repair. Despite that, it's a great player. I eventually unwrapped the electrical tape on the first valve circuit, fearing a hole, but I think it was just put there for comfort or protection, like a leather wrap. Valves show virtually no plating wear and all tuning slides move, but there is a fair bit of lime buildup, and I still need to get the bottom caps off.
Note that unlike a 1240, which is it very similar to otherwise, it has the tuning slide before the valveset. The angle of the recording bell is also a bit more forward-facing by a few degrees.
(I actually have a mid-1960s King 1240 here as well, and I'll make another post about the differences.)
(^^ I love this brace, for some reason.)
(^^ solder glob city, plus a broken brace)
Next up is a 1926 Buescher with a single MTS before the valves and a 19" recording bell. This thing is in great shape! A few dings and dents, and someone got creative with reattaching the lyre holder, but all slides work, including the goofy extra loop in the 3rd valve tubing that has a tiny slide in it. The valves on this one aren't as good, with a little bit more wear, but slides all still have pretty good pop. I was interested in how LONG this recording bell is. It's also one of the smallest recording bells I've seen, but I know Buescher made smaller ones. Reminds me of a phonograph bell or something. It's a good player. The bell needs a bit of straightening out, but the body is in great shape with no busted braces or anything.
(^^ nice repair to the lyre holder)
Here they are side-by-side:
Cool tubas!
- These users thanked the author arpthark for the post (total 4):
- sweaty (Sat Sep 02, 2023 2:20 pm) • hrender (Sat Sep 02, 2023 2:51 pm) • Dents Be Gone! (Sat Sep 02, 2023 4:29 pm) • TheBerlinerTuba (Sun Sep 03, 2023 1:42 pm)
Blake
Bean Hill Brass
Bean Hill Brass
-
- Posts: 122
- Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2023 5:44 pm
- Has thanked: 12 times
- Been thanked: 28 times
-
- Posts: 484
- Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 8:37 pm
- Has thanked: 441 times
- Been thanked: 148 times
Re: 1933 large bore King + 1926 Buescher (19" recording bell)
A terrific score all the way around! Enjoy!!
1916 Holton "Mammoth" 3 valve BBb Upright Bell Tuba
1935 King "Symphony" Bass 3 valve BBb Tuba
1998 King "2341" 4 valve BBb Tuba
1970 Yamaha "321" 4 valve BBb Tuba (Yard Goat)
1935 King "Symphony" Bass 3 valve BBb Tuba
1998 King "2341" 4 valve BBb Tuba
1970 Yamaha "321" 4 valve BBb Tuba (Yard Goat)
-
- Posts: 596
- Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2023 5:13 am
- Has thanked: 166 times
- Been thanked: 147 times
.
I agree, guys. This is the way to go.
Last edited by Dents Be Gone! on Wed May 01, 2024 8:31 am, edited 1 time in total.
- bloke
- Mid South Music
- Posts: 19413
- Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 8:55 am
- Location: western Tennessee - near Memphis
- Has thanked: 3871 times
- Been thanked: 4137 times
Re: 1933 large bore King + 1926 Buescher (19" recording bell)
At least, they were generous with the solder.
- arpthark
- Posts: 3976
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2020 4:25 pm
- Location: Southeastern Connecticut
- Has thanked: 966 times
- Been thanked: 1094 times
- Contact:
Re: 1933 large bore King + 1926 Buescher (19" recording bell)
Buescher had a lot of interesting design cues (and "interesting" design cues) that I don't think were emulated elsewhere. I've always been sort of fascinated by them.Dents Be Gone! wrote: ↑Sat Sep 02, 2023 4:29 pm I always thought those Buescher bottom bows were interesting. I would have liked to seen them made.
Blake
Bean Hill Brass
Bean Hill Brass
-
- Posts: 122
- Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2023 5:44 pm
- Has thanked: 12 times
- Been thanked: 28 times
Re: 1933 large bore King + 1926 Buescher (19" recording bell)
I remember reading (possibly from bloke) that bottom bows were like that because they were shared with the sousaphones.
- arpthark
- Posts: 3976
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2020 4:25 pm
- Location: Southeastern Connecticut
- Has thanked: 966 times
- Been thanked: 1094 times
- Contact:
Re: 1933 large bore King + 1926 Buescher (19" recording bell)
According to catalogs from the 1930s, that is just the design of the King 1240 from that time, approx. pre-1940. 1940 was around when they redesigned it with the MTS after the valves and changed some other stuff, including the smaller bore. I'm guessing that's also about when they stopped making the Monster BBbs, which used .750" tubing, so they consolidated everything to .687" or whatever the ubiquitous King size is.
Blake
Bean Hill Brass
Bean Hill Brass
-
- Posts: 1440
- Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 10:39 pm
- Location: SoCal
- Has thanked: 1570 times
- Been thanked: 468 times
Re: 1933 large bore King + 1926 Buescher (19" recording bell)
I have a 1933-1934 1240 that looks exactly the same, except the normal .689 bore. I think the .750 was an optional thing.
Last edited by York-aholic on Sun Sep 03, 2023 5:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- These users thanked the author York-aholic for the post (total 2):
- arpthark (Sun Sep 03, 2023 5:33 am) • bloke (Sun Sep 03, 2023 11:00 am)
Some old Yorks, Martins, and perhaps a King rotary valved CC
- bloke
- Mid South Music
- Posts: 19413
- Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 8:55 am
- Location: western Tennessee - near Memphis
- Has thanked: 3871 times
- Been thanked: 4137 times
Re: 1933 large bore King + 1926 Buescher (19" recording bell)
As I've said before, I have one of those four valve top action Buescher recording bases with all four valves rebuilt, as well as a complete front action Buescher four valve section of the same bore size -which is .726", I'm thinking.
I can just imagine myself in some old black and white Rod Serling Twilight Zone episode, whereby I've stopped time to get all of the projects and all of the distressed not-yet-playable professional instruments stored away all fixed up and put in top condition... and getting all carried away and never restarting time - yet aging and eventually getting sick and dying with time still stopped.
I can just imagine myself in some old black and white Rod Serling Twilight Zone episode, whereby I've stopped time to get all of the projects and all of the distressed not-yet-playable professional instruments stored away all fixed up and put in top condition... and getting all carried away and never restarting time - yet aging and eventually getting sick and dying with time still stopped.
- These users thanked the author bloke for the post:
- York-aholic (Sun Sep 03, 2023 5:34 pm)
- arpthark
- Posts: 3976
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2020 4:25 pm
- Location: Southeastern Connecticut
- Has thanked: 966 times
- Been thanked: 1094 times
- Contact:
Re: 1933 large bore King + 1926 Buescher (19" recording bell)
I was able to clear out most of the mess with all that solder on the King. I found some surprises. It was a mixture of solder and some sort of epoxy or caulk, which burned and stank. The water key nipple in the MTS was also held on by caulk or something. I was able to scrape most of it off.
Anyhow, here's what it looks like now. The non-mouthpiece end of the receiver is flared out and needs to be repaired or replaced. I can see why former owner Joe Q. Garage decided to use so much solder on it.
Here is a pile of dirt that came out of this tuba when I turned it upside down:
Yummy!
Anyhow, here's what it looks like now. The non-mouthpiece end of the receiver is flared out and needs to be repaired or replaced. I can see why former owner Joe Q. Garage decided to use so much solder on it.
Here is a pile of dirt that came out of this tuba when I turned it upside down:
Yummy!
Blake
Bean Hill Brass
Bean Hill Brass
-
- Posts: 1440
- Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 10:39 pm
- Location: SoCal
- Has thanked: 1570 times
- Been thanked: 468 times
Re: 1933 large bore King + 1926 Buescher (19" recording bell)
What a neat and unusual horn.
Some old Yorks, Martins, and perhaps a King rotary valved CC
- arpthark
- Posts: 3976
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2020 4:25 pm
- Location: Southeastern Connecticut
- Has thanked: 966 times
- Been thanked: 1094 times
- Contact:
Re: 1933 large bore King + 1926 Buescher (19" recording bell)
I am going to do my best to fix the receiver so it fits snugly on the mouthpipe, but I definitely need a new bell-to-receiver brace for this thing.
Also, one bottom valve cap is stubborn. Currently soaking in Kroil. I tried mallet tapping, turning clockwise before unscrewing counterclockwise (worked with another cap), and (eek) cloth-wrapped pliers. We'll see if the Kroil penetrates and un-seizes this at all.
Also, one bottom valve cap is stubborn. Currently soaking in Kroil. I tried mallet tapping, turning clockwise before unscrewing counterclockwise (worked with another cap), and (eek) cloth-wrapped pliers. We'll see if the Kroil penetrates and un-seizes this at all.
Blake
Bean Hill Brass
Bean Hill Brass
-
- Posts: 1440
- Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 10:39 pm
- Location: SoCal
- Has thanked: 1570 times
- Been thanked: 468 times
Re: 1933 large bore King + 1926 Buescher (19" recording bell)
I have a King bell to receiver brace. Its not silver, but you could send it to Andersons.
Some old Yorks, Martins, and perhaps a King rotary valved CC