"technical review"

Projects, repair topics, and Frankentubas
Post Reply
User avatar
bloke
Mid South Music
Posts: 19221
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 8:55 am
Location: western Tennessee - near Memphis
Has thanked: 3817 times
Been thanked: 4073 times

"technical review"

Post by bloke »

This seems to be what the German word for "complete overhaul" ends up being in English (at least, according to eBay).

My bought-new 46-year-old F tuba could use a "technical review". I hope I can find the time to do one.

For now, I have a masterworks thingie (difficult piece - two tubas) in less that three weeks.

Now that (I believe) I can play the piece (the second tuba player surely being a better musician than myself - as I made sure that someone really strong was hired to cover the part), I spent just a little bit of time (and without taking the instrument apart) removing some embarrassing nicks and bumps from this old bloke-worn instrument. (ie: "If we're not good, we can - at least - try to look good"...etc.)

Being an early 80's instrument, the bottom bow features a rib - rather than a 1970's keel. The small-side bottom bow rib tip had been mashed in a bit for quite a while...I just discovered that (without removing the bottom bow) the inside diameter right underneath that tip is 2-1/2 inches...and (guess what?) I have a 2-1/2" round steel ball...so that damage is now undone.

The uglier surface is the (delicate handmade paper-thin) nickel cap on the upper bow, which had a few embarrassing nicks in it.
Being really thin, rolling a lubricated oblong dent ball through there (with 2-inches of magnets on the outside) would have resulted in some pretty ugly solder "print-through"...so I heated the cap and burnished large areas of it (with the solder underneath the cap molden, during the burnishing). This resulted in simultaneously ironing the nickel cap, the upper bow underneath it, and pushing out excess (factory) solder - which I flicked away.

It looks pretty good, and the tiny remaining flaws can be addressed later (again, during a "technical review").

This is with no files/sandpaper/buffing...' just the fire/burnishing thing:

(' sorry about the bad lighting - resulting in a grainy pic...It's COLD outside, today.)


Image
These users thanked the author bloke for the post:
York-aholic (Sun Feb 18, 2024 7:18 pm)


York-aholic
Posts: 1424
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 10:39 pm
Location: SoCal
Has thanked: 1546 times
Been thanked: 465 times

Re: "technical review"

Post by York-aholic »

bloke wrote: Sun Feb 18, 2024 10:01 am "If we're not good, we can - at least - try to look good"...etc.)
I tend to go the other way. Since I'm a mediocre player, I try to only own tubas that look mediocre. I figure that if I showed up with something that looks 'good', people might expect that I'd be able to play 'good'.

:tuba:
These users thanked the author York-aholic for the post (total 2):
bloke (Sun Feb 18, 2024 9:52 pm) • Dents Be Gone! (Tue Feb 20, 2024 4:17 am)
Some old Yorks, Martins, and perhaps a King rotary valved CC
Dents Be Gone!
Posts: 596
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2023 5:13 am
Has thanked: 166 times
Been thanked: 147 times

.

Post by Dents Be Gone! »

I agree, guys. This is the way to go.
Last edited by Dents Be Gone! on Wed May 01, 2024 11:26 am, edited 1 time in total.
These users thanked the author Dents Be Gone! for the post:
bloke (Tue Feb 20, 2024 9:14 am)
User avatar
bloke
Mid South Music
Posts: 19221
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 8:55 am
Location: western Tennessee - near Memphis
Has thanked: 3817 times
Been thanked: 4073 times

Re: "technical review"

Post by bloke »

❤️

amen, brutish.

As the decades have marched on, our coffee consumption has continued to increase, but it's sort of like patches on a worn-out instrument. After a while, patches are being soldered over patches.
These users thanked the author bloke for the post:
Dents Be Gone! (Sat Mar 09, 2024 7:27 am)
Post Reply