Page 3 of 3
Re: Holton 345 info seeking
Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2021 1:13 pm
by Kirley
The fact that we're having discussions like this on a tuba forum is amazing.
I am proud to be part of this community!
Re: Holton 345 info seeking
Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2021 1:17 pm
by bloke
...and (please do not mistake for simplifying nor under/over-interpreting the gist of Donn's post, and also not to self-promote...but only to offer an example of "quite ornate, YET not flowers") but ornate engraving does not necessarily have to be something which would tend to be labeled as "feminine".
cimbasso...sort-of a "not-particularly-feminine-sounding instrument...
Re: Holton 345 info seeking
Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2021 2:47 pm
by donn
As you surmise, that isn't at all what I meant.
Re: Holton 345 info seeking
Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2021 3:20 pm
by jtm
Kirley wrote: ↑Sun Jan 31, 2021 1:13 pm
The fact that we're having discussions like this on a tuba forum is amazing.
I am proud to be part of this community!
I'm not quite sure how to take that first statement.
Re: Holton 345 info seeking
Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2021 8:19 pm
by dp
JeffT96 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 27, 2021 6:59 pm
I have a vague memory of seeing this thread over there before everything got ...censored. I had forgotten many details though.
You have a pretty decent contact list here, now, of reasonably-experienced, somewhat articulate Holtonians ...
Re: Holton 345 info seeking
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2021 11:07 am
by Kirley
jtm wrote: ↑Sun Jan 31, 2021 3:20 pm
Kirley wrote: ↑Sun Jan 31, 2021 1:13 pm
The fact that we're having discussions like this on a tuba forum is amazing.
I am proud to be part of this community!
I'm not quite sure how to take that first statement.
Hopefully as a compliment as that was my intent. Just happy to see discussions that go deeper into topics.
It's not that I don't "enjoy" lacquer vs silver rehash number 2,367. But a more nuanced conversation of the evolution of esthetics and manufacturing and how those interact with culture and politics is much more interesting!