dp wrote:
seen this double-ferruled 184 before?
Some of the older model 184 bells were smaller at the small end and fed into bottom bows that began smaller. I thought that those were only the older B-flat versions, but - if that's a C version - then I'm learning something. I had a good condition B-flat as described (other than a trashed bell), and I had a nice bell - off of a C - to put on it. When I discovered the disparity, I had to think about it for (actually) quite a long time and just let those unmated parts sit in the attic, but I came up with a solution which was just a bit more elegant than the one in the picture - least I believe it was. Maybe the person who purchased it from me will chime in and express their opinion on my tack.
Being offered for sale in New York City combined with the fact that our rulers decided to print a couple dozen trillion bucks out of thin air - triggering hyperinflation, I have no comment on the asking price, and not even considering how they handled the bell debacle.
EDIT:
ok...
@dp,
I found pics from THIS websites which clearly show the workaround that I used:
ALL inside that custom W-I-D-E- ferrule (bottom-to-top) are:
- the large end of the old-old-style SMALLER bottom bow
- the SMALL bottom end of the trashed original bell (carefully trimmed off the trashed bell)
- the LARGER (later-style) 184 bell
All three of them butt up flush against each other inside that wide custom ferrule.
I would guess that the reason that the two ferrules (and the brass between) take up more width than mine could be that the three (brass) pieces possibly don't butt up flush.
btw...Most of the lacquer on the valve section was in pretty good shape, so I just left it (with touch-ups).
The large bows' lacquer is obviously new, but I spent some time mixing up all sorts of translucent tints (I'm not experienced, but trial-and-error-ed) to come pretty close to matching the age-darkened color of the valve section's original lacquer...some bronze, some brown, some yellow-orange, some green, etc...