Tubas, euphoniums, mouthpieces, and anything music-related.
Forum rules
This section is for posts that are directly related to performance, performers, or equipment. Social issues are allowed, as long as they are directly related to those categories. If you see a post that you cannot respond to with respect and courtesy, we ask that you do not respond at all.
Tubajug wrote: ↑Fri Feb 28, 2025 2:19 pm
Thanks for posting a picture of yours, @donn . It does look like that bottom inner bow is different.
Is your 5th valve a useable flat whole step? Like I said, mine is an odd length...
It's fine.
[edit] But who cares, since it isn't the same model at all. Note that the valve combinations described below are for Eb tuba. [/edit]
Looks like yours has a lot of tubing. If it's for example around a minor third - 33 inches? - you might be able to survive with some alternative combinations. Like, Ab 1_3_5, G _2_45, Gb 1__45 (sharp), F _2345, E 12345.
Last edited by donn on Sun Mar 02, 2025 1:02 am, edited 2 times in total.
I brought home a Kanstul euphonium to test drive when the 2010 ITEA was in Tucson. It was so horribly out of tune with itself that I was astonished. That was, in my opinion, a design flaw, and it was the one they brought to be a demo. So your problem does not surprise me.
I suspect that everything was so rushed towards the end that they brought things to market before they were dialed in, or even consistently made over a several same model span, ie quite a bit of variation from horn to horn.
Some old Yorks, Martins, and perhaps a King rotary valved CC
Kanstul isn't that bad, either. I have to confess to a senior moment here - my tuba isn't a 33-S, it's a 66-S Eb. These two tubas look more similar than they probably even should. The 33-S is BBb. So ... never mind. Sorry!
MiBrassFS wrote: ↑Sat Mar 01, 2025 4:46 am
How about something like the old York “high pitch/low pitch” pigtail curly-Q that some of their tubas carried on board?
