Another Piggy question

Tubas, euphoniums, mouthpieces, and anything music-related.
Forum rules
This section is for posts that are directly related to performance, performers, or equipment. Social issues are allowed, as long as they are directly related to those categories. If you see a post that you cannot respond to with respect and courtesy, we ask that you do not respond at all.
Post Reply
royjohn
Posts: 81
Joined: Fri May 28, 2021 1:49 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 19 times

Another Piggy question

Post by royjohn »

I'm thinking of changing from my Mack 410 to a Piggy...the reasons being to get a darker, more colorful sound and to get a somewhat greater volume capability. I wonder if the Piggy is going to be an air hog. I have heard people say it plays easily and other folks say that it plays big "if pushed." I wonder if that means that I'm going to have to use a lot of air to get that bigger sound.

Does changing from the Mack to a "good" Piggy (one with decent intonation) sound like a good or a bad idea? Thanks for any input. The horn in question is one of the old Sanders Piggies...
Thanks,
royjohn :huh: :huh: :huh:


User avatar
ronr
Posts: 203
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 10:13 am
Location: North of Bort2.0, south of MN_Tim
Has thanked: 42 times
Been thanked: 67 times

Re: Another Piggy question

Post by ronr »

I play a Packer 379Bb which is a copy of a Cervany Piggy. Big sound, easy blow, small-ish horn. I have no trouble filling it with air, and putting out a lot of sound, with my 66-y.o. Lungs.
These users thanked the author ronr for the post:
MN_TimTuba (Sun Feb 26, 2023 9:50 pm)
2013 J Packer 379 Bbb
1905 York Helicon
1960 Reynolds Contempora Sousaphone
2022 Wessex fiberglass sousaphone
User avatar
LeMark
Site Admin
Posts: 2687
Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2020 8:03 am
Location: Arlington TX
Has thanked: 72 times
Been thanked: 761 times

Re: Another Piggy question

Post by LeMark »

The packer is similar to the piggy in size only. It's closer to a 186 with a wrap that gives it a shorter height. I own one, and owned a piggy for 20 years. the packer is good, but it's no piggy

the piggy is an 835 bore, and yes, it's an air hog, but not as much as my 601. what more, I paired it with a bach 7 megatone that had a larger throat, in order to not make it seem too bright
Attachments
cerveny family 600.jpg
cerveny family 600.jpg (97.97 KiB) Viewed 511 times
These users thanked the author LeMark for the post:
MN_TimTuba (Sun Feb 26, 2023 9:49 pm)
Yep, I'm Mark
User avatar
LeMark
Site Admin
Posts: 2687
Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2020 8:03 am
Location: Arlington TX
Has thanked: 72 times
Been thanked: 761 times

Re: Another Piggy question

Post by LeMark »

I've got news for you. the 16 inch bell of the piggy isn't going to provide any darker sound than what you already have. Different? sure, and they are a blast to play if you get a good one, but the 410 is a very good copy of a very good tuba. I'm not sure it would be that much of an upgrade for you
These users thanked the author LeMark for the post:
Ace (Mon Feb 27, 2023 12:52 am)
Yep, I'm Mark
User avatar
arpthark
Posts: 3243
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2020 4:25 pm
Location: Southeastern Connecticut
Has thanked: 736 times
Been thanked: 886 times

Re: Another Piggy question

Post by arpthark »

I am an avowed Piggy fan, but I have a suspicion that some of the things that players say about Pigs has to do with the bell being so short and close to the ear. Out in the hall, it may not be as big of a difference.

I owned a 410 and a Piggy at the same time. Despite the large bore I found the Piggy pretty easy to play. The low range was more responsive and less tight than the 410. Intonation was more challenging, obviously. I preferred the Pig and should've kept it.

I am a little confused by the comment "darker and more colorful," because I view those as opposite characteristics in sound quality, but everyone has different definitions about what those words mean in relation to tuba tone. I thought the Piggy sounded a little "rougher" than the 410, but again, bell proximity to the ear is a factor.
Blake
User avatar
LeMark
Site Admin
Posts: 2687
Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2020 8:03 am
Location: Arlington TX
Has thanked: 72 times
Been thanked: 761 times

Re: Another Piggy question

Post by LeMark »

I have at least three videos on youtube with me playing my piggy. If you search for Cerveny piggy, two of them come up. this one doesn't for some reason

Yep, I'm Mark
User avatar
bort2.0
Posts: 5214
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 9:13 am
Location: Minneapolis
Has thanked: 332 times
Been thanked: 981 times

Re: Another Piggy question

Post by bort2.0 »

LeMark wrote: Sat Feb 18, 2023 12:43 pm I've got news for you. the 16 inch bell of the piggy isn't going to provide any darker sound than what you already have. Different? sure, and they are a blast to play if you get a good one, but the 410 is a very good copy of a very good tuba. I'm not sure it would be that much of an upgrade for you
Not even with the much-larger bore of the Piggy?
User avatar
LeMark
Site Admin
Posts: 2687
Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2020 8:03 am
Location: Arlington TX
Has thanked: 72 times
Been thanked: 761 times

Re: Another Piggy question

Post by LeMark »

I think the Bell that is 2 in larger would counteract the larger bore
These users thanked the author LeMark for the post:
bort2.0 (Sat Feb 18, 2023 2:12 pm)
Yep, I'm Mark
royjohn
Posts: 81
Joined: Fri May 28, 2021 1:49 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 19 times

Re: Another Piggy question

Post by royjohn »

Well, I went up to Buckeye Brass and Winds last week and tried their 4 valve Piggy...they had sold the 5 valve they had a few days before I got there. Rob Phillips and Shawn were both very accommodating and helpful. Buckeye is a good place to try horns because it is in a converted church, so there is no need to wonder what the horn is going to sound like in a bigger space.

As far as sound is concerned, I loved the horn. IDK whether I should call it a more mellow sound than the 410 or darker, but it is definitely very colorful and absolutely beautiful. The lower register opens up more than the 410 and is very strong. The middle and upper registers are very nice, too. The horn sounded great to me below the bell and also sounded about the same when I got Rob to play it and stepped away from it in a large room. I did find that there were some intonation quirks, but didn't note where exactly they were...some in the middle of the staff, a few low notes. I didn't take note of the exact notes because I just wondered how I would deal with several pitches that I couldn't quite seem to lip into tune. They weren't that far out, maybe 10 or 15 cents, but I didn't have the skills to deal with them.

The other thing that was a surprise to me was how open the horn was. I felt very little resistance and ran out of air about three quarter notes before the end of phrases I can play easily on my 410. I'm not exactly sure whether I was using too much air and playing too loudly or not. I have to say that I don't, at 75 y/o and out of shape, have the lung capacity of a typical middle aged tuba player, who might handle the Piggy just fine.

I'd have to commit to a serious fitness program to lose fat and increase endurance before I could consider the Piggy. YMWV.

As I said, Rob and Shawn were very helpful and I will visit them again if I find another of their horns that I want to try. Rob says that he has an order from Cerveny scheduled to arrive soon, so there will be a lot more horns to try soon.
royjohn :thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup:
These users thanked the author royjohn for the post:
arpthark (Sun Feb 26, 2023 7:41 pm)
Post Reply