I bought that weird 5-valve-inline Alex 163 CC!

Tubas, euphoniums, mouthpieces, and anything music-related.
Forum rules
This section is for posts that are directly related to performance, performers, or equipment. Social issues are allowed, as long as they are directly related to those categories. If you see a post that you cannot respond to with respect and courtesy, we ask that you do not respond at all.
User avatar
bloke
Mid South Music
Posts: 18626
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 8:55 am
Location: western Tennessee - near Memphis
Has thanked: 3662 times
Been thanked: 3936 times

Re: I bought that weird 5-valve-inline Alex 163 CC!

Post by bloke »

Decoding the fifth valve spatula position (and for whatever reason it was done (either a bum left hand, or the desire to manipulate the #1 slide on-the-fly) is pretty simple:

The 5th and 1st spatulas are extremely close.

The player either depresses the "first" valve spatula normally, or reaches over with the index finger and depresses the "fifth" valve spatula, or depresses both the #5 and #1 spatulas at the same time.


User avatar
Mary Ann
Posts: 2918
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 9:24 am
Has thanked: 482 times
Been thanked: 575 times

Re: I bought that weird 5-valve-inline Alex 163 CC!

Post by Mary Ann »

I think you would need a spatulated first finger to hit both at once.
User avatar
matt g
Posts: 2556
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 10:37 am
Location: Southeastern New England
Has thanked: 262 times
Been thanked: 548 times

Re: I bought that weird 5-valve-inline Alex 163 CC!

Post by matt g »

Mary Ann wrote: Sat Jun 08, 2024 10:19 am I think you would need a spatulated first finger to hit both at once.
Given the roughly 1/16th of an inch gap and the typical ape hands of most of the dudes in this forum it’s probably not too hard to get both down at the same time.
Dillon/Walters CC (sold)
Meinl-Weston 2165 (sold)
User avatar
arpthark
Posts: 3603
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2020 4:25 pm
Location: Southeastern Connecticut
Has thanked: 846 times
Been thanked: 991 times
Contact:

Re: I bought that weird 5-valve-inline Alex 163 CC!

Post by arpthark »

I'll see if I can manage two for one.
User avatar
arpthark
Posts: 3603
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2020 4:25 pm
Location: Southeastern Connecticut
Has thanked: 846 times
Been thanked: 991 times
Contact:

Re: I bought that weird 5-valve-inline Alex 163 CC!

Post by arpthark »

It's very easy to play 5+1 with the index finger alone. It doesn't present a very useful combination, but you can do it.
Heavy_Metal
Posts: 329
Joined: Sat Aug 15, 2020 5:23 pm
Location: Baltimore, MD, USA
Has thanked: 51 times
Been thanked: 91 times

Re: I bought that weird 5-valve-inline Alex 163 CC!

Post by Heavy_Metal »

Stryk wrote: Thu Jun 06, 2024 9:21 amCONGRATS! Welcome back to the club of Alex owners!
This!

I believe those clocksprings are a later version. Mine have tension adjusters, which I've only seen on very early 20th century or earlier tubas.
Principal tuba, Bel Air Community Band
Old (early 1900s?) Alexander BBb proto-163
1976 Sonora (B&S 101) 4-rotor BBb
1964 Conn 20J/21J BBb (one body, both bells)
1970s Marzan Slant-rotor BBb
~1904 York 3P BBb Helicon
Old Alex Comp.F, in shop
donn
Posts: 1304
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2020 2:31 pm
Location: Portugal
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 163 times

Re: I bought that weird 5-valve-inline Alex 163 CC!

Post by donn »

Červený's CEP 831 oval baritone had clock springs with tension adjusters, still in their catalogue. It isn't necessarily like a bad idea that was quickly abandoned, it could be more of a deluxe model feature.
User avatar
bloke
Mid South Music
Posts: 18626
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 8:55 am
Location: western Tennessee - near Memphis
Has thanked: 3662 times
Been thanked: 3936 times

Re: I bought that weird 5-valve-inline Alex 163 CC!

Post by bloke »

Blake,
Assuming that all five valves down is double low B natural, that's probably the only time you push both. Other times you would reach over past the first valve and push the fifth.
User avatar
arpthark
Posts: 3603
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2020 4:25 pm
Location: Southeastern Connecticut
Has thanked: 846 times
Been thanked: 991 times
Contact:

Re: I bought that weird 5-valve-inline Alex 163 CC!

Post by arpthark »

bloke wrote: Mon Jun 10, 2024 6:47 am Blake,
Assuming that all five valves down is double low B natural, that's probably the only time you push both. Other times you would reach over past the first valve and push the fifth.
Since it's a 2-step 5th valve, all five nets a somewhat sharp pedal C. I'm unfamiliar with the 2-step 5th so I will definitely have to do some work with a tuner to see what's useful. I seem to recall using 125 for a better in-tune Db/C# on an old Mirafone 184 I had.
donn wrote: Mon Jun 10, 2024 1:18 am Červený's CEP 831 oval baritone had clock springs with tension adjusters, still in their catalogue. It isn't necessarily like a bad idea that was quickly abandoned, it could be more of a deluxe model feature.
I admire your use of diacritics. Yeah, with a boutique maker like Alexander who will make basically anything for anyone if they want it, it seems like a wayward path to attempt to date this tuba by the clockspring mechanisms. Maybe I will shoot Alexander an email and see if they can provide any insight.

What we do know:
- handmade / weighs a scant 20 lbs even with the fifth valve
- non-adjustable clockspring levers
- giant receiver
- gold brass (maybe? definitely seems more reddish than my last Alex), unlacquered
- 2-step 5th valve that was converted from left hand to right hand index finger with non-Alex parts
- came from WA

It seems the Charles Coffinger mentioned by @Tim Jackson in a previous post has passed away as of a couple years ago.
User avatar
bloke
Mid South Music
Posts: 18626
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 8:55 am
Location: western Tennessee - near Memphis
Has thanked: 3662 times
Been thanked: 3936 times

Re: I bought that weird 5-valve-inline Alex 163 CC!

Post by bloke »

Were it that I felt the necessity to preserve that mouthpipe, I would probably remove it, have someone duplicate it (with the small end tapering down to a c. .530" bore - just before the STANDARD SHANK receiver) and put the original in a crush-proof box.

Let me defend my proposed tack in this way:
If you came across a pretty darn good playing vintage 186 C, would you replace it's mouthpipe tube with one with a ginormous mouthpipe and ginormous receiver?
donn
Posts: 1304
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2020 2:31 pm
Location: Portugal
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 163 times

Re: I bought that weird 5-valve-inline Alex 163 CC!

Post by donn »

Good idea - maybe if you put the word out, someone would like to trade their good playing vintage 186 C, for that Alexander. Then you'd have the right size leadpipe, and the tuba it was made for.
User avatar
bloke
Mid South Music
Posts: 18626
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 8:55 am
Location: western Tennessee - near Memphis
Has thanked: 3662 times
Been thanked: 3936 times

Re: I bought that weird 5-valve-inline Alex 163 CC!

Post by bloke »

I might give you a C+ in smartassing for that, but I've owned one of those instruments with a gigantic mouthpipe, and I was finally able to use it after I put a straight 4 inch tapered insert in the front end of the pipe which caused the small end to be more like the overwhelming majority of other instruments out there. I think there's a reason why most who have played old Alexander tubas - as well as new ones - like the new ones much better, and I would wager it's not because they are shinier. I've also noticed that most of the older ones (that people have shown me, asking me to try their instrument, because it plays so much better than some of the other old ones) feature more conventional mouthpipe tubes.

The same thing happened with model 2165 tubas. The first thing that was done to make them more accessible to the overwhelming of majority of players (and regardless of player ability level) was to come out with the model 2265, which featured a more conventional (rather than crazy ginormous) mouthpipe, then the next step was to come up with a more conservative taper into the large bows - which resulted in the model 6450. It's not exactly my cup of tea, but people rave about the model 6450 and not all that many people rave about the 2165 model or the 2265 model, even though (as with the giant mouthpipe Alexanders) some people have left them as they are and deal with them and whatever ways they've managed to deal with them...

...so you can consider your post having been a successful troll, since I responded to it. Give yourself one in the plus column.😎👌
User avatar
arpthark
Posts: 3603
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2020 4:25 pm
Location: Southeastern Connecticut
Has thanked: 846 times
Been thanked: 991 times
Contact:

Re: I bought that weird 5-valve-inline Alex 163 CC!

Post by arpthark »

Finally managed to haul this to rehearsal last night, rehearsing outside by the beach with a cool breeze off of Long Island Sound and escaping the heat dome over New England right now.

The clocksprings are a bit too slow to play the 16th notes in Stars & Stripes, so I might get some coins to get some more leverage on the paddles.

Unfortunately, one of the thumbscrews snapped off (failed solder joint looks like) of the 2nd valve during rehearsal and I was dealing with that all night.

I bought a Doug Elliott A+ shank mouthpiece to use with this, and intonation became much more tenuous after abandoning the super shallow provided Alex mouthpiece. Also, it just barely plays up to A=440, which in a community group that means I might as well have been playing at A=438.

All that said, it sounds fantastic, and one of the nice things about it is that there is no real difference in feel for the 1-3 G and the 1-3 D in the staff. G is lippable open (10-20c flat) but D is unusable with first valve alone -- registering on my tuner as a very sharp C#.

The current plan is to have the MTS and first valve slide trimmed just a bit and get the fifth valve swapped to thumb-operated. I think I will leave it at the two-step length for now.
prairieboy1
Posts: 482
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 8:37 pm
Has thanked: 428 times
Been thanked: 146 times

Re: I bought that weird 5-valve-inline Alex 163 CC!

Post by prairieboy1 »

Congratulations on your new purchase! The horn looks fantastic. I was interested to read about the history of your horn. I wonder if the original owner was Fred Geib?
1916 Holton "Mammoth" 3 valve BBb Upright Bell Tuba
1935 King "Symphony" Bass 3 valve BBb Tuba
1998 King "2341" 4 valve BBb Tuba
1970 Yamaha "321" 4 valve BBb Tuba (Yard Goat)
User avatar
iiipopes
Posts: 1027
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 4:26 pm
Has thanked: 135 times
Been thanked: 179 times

Re: I bought that weird 5-valve-inline Alex 163 CC!

Post by iiipopes »

I won't say "my two bits" because this is not a souzy. I will suggest that you look to see the actual geometry of the 5th valve slide. The reason is that maybe you can retain the original slide that intones 2+3, and simply have a new slide made for the flat whole step we are all now accustomed to. Yes, from looking at the linkage, it appears to have been converted from 4+1 at one point, so taking that back is necessary.
Jupiter JTU1110
"Real" Conn 36K
Klier 4B Classic
User avatar
arpthark
Posts: 3603
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2020 4:25 pm
Location: Southeastern Connecticut
Has thanked: 846 times
Been thanked: 991 times
Contact:

Re: I bought that weird 5-valve-inline Alex 163 CC!

Post by arpthark »

iiipopes wrote: Fri Jun 21, 2024 7:15 am I won't say "my two bits" because this is not a souzy. I will suggest that you look to see the actual geometry of the 5th valve slide. The reason is that maybe you can retain the original slide that intones 2+3, and simply have a new slide made for the flat whole step we are all now accustomed to. Yes, from looking at the linkage, it appears to have been converted from 4+1 at one point, so taking that back is necessary.
Thanks, I have thought about this in a similar tack. The actual slide for the 5th valve circuit is actually very short and visible on the front of the instrument right next to the 1st valve slide. Most of the length of the 5th valve circuit is located in the back of the instrument where it is nestled close to the valve section. It does have a ferrule, which indicates a point at which a cut could occur, but honestly, playing 235 for low F and maybe 125 for C#/low F# is not going to be a huge dealbreaker for me.
These users thanked the author arpthark for the post:
iiipopes (Fri Jun 21, 2024 12:19 pm)
User avatar
bloke
Mid South Music
Posts: 18626
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 8:55 am
Location: western Tennessee - near Memphis
Has thanked: 3662 times
Been thanked: 3936 times

Re: I bought that weird 5-valve-inline Alex 163 CC!

Post by bloke »

If I didn't have all these school instruments to unsmush, if I liked Alexander tubas, if I wanted to keep that one, if I didn't steer clear of them to buy - even for flipping, I would have already straightened that thing out.
User avatar
arpthark
Posts: 3603
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2020 4:25 pm
Location: Southeastern Connecticut
Has thanked: 846 times
Been thanked: 991 times
Contact:

Re: I bought that weird 5-valve-inline Alex 163 CC!

Post by arpthark »

bloke wrote: Fri Jun 21, 2024 8:10 am If I didn't have all these school instruments to unsmush, if I liked Alexander tubas, if I wanted to keep that one, if I didn't steer clear of them to buy - even for flipping, I would have already straightened that thing out.
Headed to Shires (well, a Shires person) after the 4th to get everything sorted out. :thumbsup:
User avatar
bloke
Mid South Music
Posts: 18626
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 8:55 am
Location: western Tennessee - near Memphis
Has thanked: 3662 times
Been thanked: 3936 times

Re: I bought that weird 5-valve-inline Alex 163 CC!

Post by bloke »

That sounds great. I believe I read that you said that it's a good player.
User avatar
MiBrassFS
Posts: 423
Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2024 8:25 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 123 times

Re: I bought that weird 5-valve-inline Alex 163 CC!

Post by MiBrassFS »

arpthark wrote: Fri Jun 21, 2024 6:48 pmHeaded to Shires (well, a Shires person) after the 4th to get everything sorted out. :thumbsup:
By any chance would that be a fella named Paul?
Post Reply