Bell diameter, flare, taper, etc.

Tubas, euphoniums, mouthpieces, and anything music-related.
Forum rules
This section is for posts that are directly related to performance, performers, or equipment. Social issues are allowed, as long as they are directly related to those categories. If you see a post that you cannot respond to with respect and courtesy, we ask that you do not respond at all.
Grumpikins
Posts: 416
Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2022 3:09 pm
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 102 times

Bell diameter, flare, taper, etc.

Post by Grumpikins »

I'm wondering about the effects of different varieties of the above mentioned features on a tuba.

For this discussion, say you could try multiple variations on a single tuba.

Anybody know of actual scientific research on this yielding measurable data?

Frankentubaists experience swapping bells?

I'm curious about this because of the new .marching tubas our school bought. The bells are obscenely huge. It seems to me that is a detriment to projection of sound. Doesn't the larger diameter "pancake" style bell flare diffuse sound more?

Sent from my SM-S367VL using Tapatalk



Meinl Weston 2145 CC
King Symphonic BBb circa 1936ish
Pre H.N.White, Cleveland Eb 1924ish (project)
Conn Sousaphone, fiberglass 1960s? (Project)
Olds Baritone 1960s?
:smilie7:
OhTubaGuy
Posts: 29
Joined: Sun May 22, 2022 6:41 am
Has thanked: 23 times
Been thanked: 5 times

Re: Bell diameter, flare, taper, etc.

Post by OhTubaGuy »

Curious about these new instruments. Can you share photos or model information?
OhTubaGuy
Gnagey/Martin Mammoth BBb
King BBb sousaphone
User avatar
UncleBeer
Posts: 524
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 8:37 am
Has thanked: 64 times
Been thanked: 283 times

Re: Bell diameter, flare, taper, etc.

Post by UncleBeer »

Grumpikins wrote: Thu Aug 22, 2024 5:47 pm Anybody know of actual scientific research on this yielding measurable data?
This hardware/software package allows physical modeling of real-world instruments. You can get an idea of tuning, response, and resonance from the results you input. It's pretty amazing (yes, I own one). https://www.artim.at/en/bias-for-brasses_extended/

I proposed a discussion of this tool at last year's Arizona conference, but was refused.
These users thanked the author UncleBeer for the post (total 3):
TxTx (Thu Aug 22, 2024 7:48 pm) • bloke (Thu Aug 22, 2024 9:37 pm) • Lee Stofer (Fri Aug 23, 2024 8:27 am)
User avatar
bloke
Mid South Music
Posts: 19230
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 8:55 am
Location: western Tennessee - near Memphis
Has thanked: 3819 times
Been thanked: 4073 times

Re: Bell diameter, flare, taper, etc.

Post by bloke »

UncleBeer wrote: Thu Aug 22, 2024 6:44 pm
Grumpikins wrote: Thu Aug 22, 2024 5:47 pm Anybody know of actual scientific research on this yielding measurable data?
This hardware/software package allows physical modeling of real-world instruments. You can get an idea of tuning, response, and resonance from the results you input. It's pretty amazing (yes, I own one). https://www.artim.at/en/bias-for-brasses_extended/

I proposed a discussion of this tool at last year's Arizona conference, but was refused.
casting pearls before swine
These users thanked the author bloke for the post:
Mary Ann (Fri Aug 23, 2024 8:11 am)
catgrowlB
Posts: 59
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2023 8:46 pm
Has thanked: 53 times
Been thanked: 18 times

Re: Bell diameter, flare, taper, etc.

Post by catgrowlB »

Grumpikins wrote: Thu Aug 22, 2024 5:47 pm
I'm curious about this because of the new .marching tubas our school bought. The bells are obscenely huge. It seems to me that is a detriment to projection of sound. Doesn't the larger diameter "pancake" style bell flare diffuse sound more?

Sent from my SM-S367VL using Tapatalk
Are those marching tubas the YBB 202's with the circa 21 inch bells? It just means they are a little closer to the sousaphone sound, which I think on field is good. Most sousas have 24" to 26" bells.

A wider bell will diffuse, but also mellow and 'blossom' the sound. It will also take away some punch and clarity. Everything is a give and take. Bell flare taper and throat give sound color.

Mouthpipe and valveset bore size will mostly affect response and output.

Inner and outer bows affect a little of everything, but the taper rate mostly affect intonation.

:smilie8:
User avatar
bloke
Mid South Music
Posts: 19230
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 8:55 am
Location: western Tennessee - near Memphis
Has thanked: 3819 times
Been thanked: 4073 times

Re: Bell diameter, flare, taper, etc.

Post by bloke »

...so Yama is having a bell diameter contest with King...??

I picked up another couple of schools, this summer.
One handed me their "spare" (trashed) contra to repair.
They own Kings...

I believe they're going to continue to use me...The tuba playin' assistant band director told me that the one I fixed is going to be swapped out for the one the first-chair kid was using.

I only recently repaired a couple of the Yamaha ones for the first time ever...This was the first King I'd ever fixed.
(Not many high schools - at least, not around here - use contras.)

The King (originally) had a tune-any-note gadget on it. The slide for it is still aligned perfectly, but they?/someone? had removed the gadgetry.
I asked about replacing it, and I was told they don't use those...so whatever. (I suspect they would help...)
Grumpikins
Posts: 416
Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2022 3:09 pm
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 102 times

Re: Bell diameter, flare, taper, etc.

Post by Grumpikins »

They are king something marching tubas. They are huge. Much bigger than the G contras I marched with.

On the field, outdoors, I would much rather have more clarity and punch than tone color. Low brass always sounds like mud to me when I'm in the stands.

Anyway. I didnt want to discuss what horns are better. I just wanted some input about the specific effect of those details on bells.

Sent from my SM-S367VL using Tapatalk

Meinl Weston 2145 CC
King Symphonic BBb circa 1936ish
Pre H.N.White, Cleveland Eb 1924ish (project)
Conn Sousaphone, fiberglass 1960s? (Project)
Olds Baritone 1960s?
:smilie7:
User avatar
Mary Ann
Posts: 3021
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 9:24 am
Has thanked: 517 times
Been thanked: 598 times

Re: Bell diameter, flare, taper, etc.

Post by Mary Ann »

"Anyway. I didnt want to discuss what horns are better. I just wanted some input about the specific effect of those details on bells."

You have not yet learned that the OP has zero control over where the TFFJ takes the thread?

But the software (?) looks interesting to me and I'd be interested in who wrote it, because that's where the knowledge came from, having had both a Lawson mouthpiece and bell make noticeable significant changes to my Schmid horn's sound, response, intonation, and slotting.
User avatar
iiipopes
Posts: 1049
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 4:26 pm
Has thanked: 136 times
Been thanked: 186 times

Re: Bell diameter, flare, taper, etc.

Post by iiipopes »

The solution is to discontinue bazooka style marching tubas and to reinstate the sousaphone.
These users thanked the author iiipopes for the post:
Mary Ann (Fri Aug 23, 2024 11:06 am)
Jupiter JTU1110 - K&G 3F
"Real" Conn 36K - JK 4B Classic
tokuno
Posts: 108
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2020 1:21 pm
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 49 times

Re: Bell diameter, flare, taper, etc.

Post by tokuno »

Grumpikins wrote: Thu Aug 22, 2024 5:47 pm Doesn't the larger diameter "pancake" style bell flare diffuse sound more?
Mary Ann wrote: Fri Aug 23, 2024 8:17 am You have not yet learned that the OP has zero control over where the TFFJ takes the thread?

Did someone say Pancakes!? I love pancakes!
:smilie7: :teeth:
User avatar
Mary Ann
Posts: 3021
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 9:24 am
Has thanked: 517 times
Been thanked: 598 times

Re: Bell diameter, flare, taper, etc.

Post by Mary Ann »

Only with real maple syrup, otherwise bleah.
User avatar
bloke
Mid South Music
Posts: 19230
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 8:55 am
Location: western Tennessee - near Memphis
Has thanked: 3819 times
Been thanked: 4073 times

Re: Bell diameter, flare, taper, etc.

Post by bloke »

Mary Ann wrote: Fri Aug 23, 2024 11:06 am Only with real maple syrup, otherwise bleah.
Once there was no more Aunt Jemima nor Indian girl on the butter pkg., I was done with 'em.
User avatar
MiBrassFS
Posts: 614
Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2024 8:25 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 186 times

Re: Bell diameter, flare, taper, etc.

Post by MiBrassFS »

Mrs. Butterworth still loves ya, Joe…

“Real” maple syrup can mean all sorts of things. Lots of different grades. Gotta be in a small range or is can taste like yuck.
These users thanked the author MiBrassFS for the post:
bloke (Fri Aug 23, 2024 6:04 pm)
peterbas
Posts: 547
Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2020 12:42 pm
Has thanked: 84 times
Been thanked: 113 times

Re: Bell diameter, flare, taper, etc.

Post by peterbas »

Mary Ann wrote: Fri Aug 23, 2024 8:17 am
But the software (?) looks interesting to me and I'd be interested in who wrote it, because that's where the knowledge came from, having had both a Lawson mouthpiece and bell make noticeable significant changes to my Schmid horn's sound, response, intonation, and slotting.
Read the "about us" https://www.artim.at/en/about-us/
and https://www.widholm.at/innovationen_en/
These users thanked the author peterbas for the post:
Mary Ann (Fri Aug 23, 2024 4:03 pm)
User avatar
UncleBeer
Posts: 524
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 8:37 am
Has thanked: 64 times
Been thanked: 283 times

Re: Bell diameter, flare, taper, etc.

Post by UncleBeer »

Mary Ann wrote: Fri Aug 23, 2024 8:17 am But the software (?) looks interesting to me and I'd be interested in who wrote it, because that's where the knowledge came from, having had both a Lawson mouthpiece and bell make noticeable significant changes to my Schmid horn's sound, response, intonation, and slotting.
One of the developers, Gregor is an accomplished hornist. I've had extensive correspondence with him; he knows both the technical- and the human side of brass playing.
Grumpikins
Posts: 416
Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2022 3:09 pm
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 102 times

Re: Bell diameter, flare, taper, etc.

Post by Grumpikins »

iiipopes wrote:The solution is to discontinue bazooka style marching tubas and to reinstate the sousaphone.
I agree wholeheartedly. The bazookas belong in drum and bugle corps. But there's no arguing with band directors who want to leach everything they can from drum corps.

How about doing something original. How about traditional? I would love to see a hs marching band do an old school show.

How about setting some educational requirements to be included in the shows. Then the competitors can be judged on their execution of the requirements. Blah, blah, blah.

I've thought about marching band a lot. Too much. Now I've vented. Thank you.

Sent from my SM-S367VL using Tapatalk

Meinl Weston 2145 CC
King Symphonic BBb circa 1936ish
Pre H.N.White, Cleveland Eb 1924ish (project)
Conn Sousaphone, fiberglass 1960s? (Project)
Olds Baritone 1960s?
:smilie7:
User avatar
Mary Ann
Posts: 3021
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 9:24 am
Has thanked: 517 times
Been thanked: 598 times

Re: Bell diameter, flare, taper, etc.

Post by Mary Ann »

peterbas wrote: Fri Aug 23, 2024 3:29 pm
Mary Ann wrote: Fri Aug 23, 2024 8:17 am
But the software (?) looks interesting to me and I'd be interested in who wrote it, because that's where the knowledge came from, having had both a Lawson mouthpiece and bell make noticeable significant changes to my Schmid horn's sound, response, intonation, and slotting.
Read the "about us" https://www.artim.at/en/about-us/
and https://www.widholm.at/innovationen_en/
I read a great deal of it -- fascinating. I understand that the later versions of the software can make "suggestions" to improve the outcome? I have always wondered how Walter Lawson did what he did, and maybe he had access to something like this. I always considered him brilliant (and a very nice man too.)

Not really on topic but I always have wanted the opportunity to spend some time with a Vienna horn, the "horn sound of all horn sounds." I have the VIenna horns CD and compare it (and its cover) with the London Horn Sound CD. Different beasts.
User avatar
bloke
Mid South Music
Posts: 19230
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 8:55 am
Location: western Tennessee - near Memphis
Has thanked: 3819 times
Been thanked: 4073 times

Re: Bell diameter, flare, taper, etc.

Post by bloke »

I think the computer program is really interesting, though it's not something that I would personally purchase. If we're talking across three topics which are bell tapers, computer programs that can figure them out, and marching contras, I'd like to hear a marching contra with a Meinl-Weston 97 bell on it. (POW !!! :bugeyes: :smilie8: )

semi-on-topic comment:

A genuine one-piece upright 100-year-old or more Conn Orchestra Grand bell makes those instruments sound a lot to me like a Rudy Meinl 5/4. I'm thinking the extra one inch or so of pancake radius really doesn't do much of anything. The upper part of the bell taper on those is not as large as the typical CSO York 6/4 knockoff, and I suspect that has a lot to do with it. The computer program might show me to be insightful (in this very limited subtopical portion of this topic), or it might (and more likely) show me to be a fool.
catgrowlB
Posts: 59
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2023 8:46 pm
Has thanked: 53 times
Been thanked: 18 times

Re: Bell diameter, flare, taper, etc.

Post by catgrowlB »

Grumpikins wrote: Fri Aug 23, 2024 3:47 am
They are king something marching tubas. They are huge. Much bigger than the G contras I marched with.

On the field, outdoors, I would much rather have more clarity and punch than tone color. Low brass always sounds like mud to me when I'm in the stands.

Sent from my SM-S367VL using Tapatalk
I think the larger bell contras are a good thing. You can still get plenty of punch and clarity with larger bell contras and sousas. And still retain warmth and richness.

I remember back in my high school days (1990s), my band director was talking about how good the top Drum Corps were. Listening to some of their recordings at the time, I wasn't particularly impressed with the contra sound I heard. They sounded grunty/farty, not warm or rich enough for my tastes.
More modern contras are larger, pitched in BBb and have larger bells and, imo, sound much better than those old GG contras.

Well-played, sousas sound the best outside on the field. And that includes all contras, marching tubas, and even helicons.
:teeth:
catgrowlB
Posts: 59
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2023 8:46 pm
Has thanked: 53 times
Been thanked: 18 times

Re: Bell diameter, flare, taper, etc.

Post by catgrowlB »

bloke wrote: Fri Aug 23, 2024 6:11 pm

A genuine one-piece upright 100-year-old or more Conn Orchestra Grand bell makes those instruments sound a lot to me like a Rudy Meinl 5/4. I'm thinking the extra one inch or so of pancake radius really doesn't do much of anything. The upper part of the bell taper on those is not as large as the typical CSO York 6/4 knockoff, and I suspect that has a lot to do with it. The computer program might show me to be insightful (in this very limited subtopical portion of this topic), or it might (and more likely) show me to be a fool.
I'd most likely prefer that old big Conn Orchestra Grand BBb over any 6/4 York CC in a large wind band/concert band, and possibly orchestra. Those old Conn tubas have a considerably darker sound profile than the various York tubas. Much more fundamental gives a more string bass section quality sound out in the audience. Honestly not many bands these days have a dark enough tuba sound. Big and loud, yes, but dark enough, not really. Bring back the midnight dark band tuba sound that was felt as much as heard :tuba:
Post Reply