York Master .750" BBb body/valveset poll

Projects, repair topics, and Frankentubas

What should I do with the York Master .750" bore 4v set and body I have?

Find a removable recording or upright bell (rare) and sell the complete horn
2
25%
Hang on to it to use in a future unknown project (maybe in a 6/4 York?)
6
75%
 
Total votes: 8

York-aholic
Posts: 1870
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 10:39 pm
Location: SoCal
Has thanked: 2422 times
Been thanked: 710 times

Re: York Master .750" BBb body/valveset poll

Post by York-aholic »

arpthark wrote: Tue May 26, 2026 11:59 am
Image

I think the trickiest part would be rerouting the 4th valve tubing since the 6/4 York has a branch of the bugle in the way:
@arpthark, I'll email you a picture or two of my York 736 which is an original 6/4 with 4 front action valves so you can look at that and compare. The only non-original part is that I swapped the fixed recording bell for a fixed upright.


Some old Yorks, Martins, and perhaps a King rotary valved CC
User avatar
tubatodd
Posts: 442
Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2020 5:47 pm
Has thanked: 598 times
Been thanked: 193 times

Re: York Master .750" BBb body/valveset poll

Post by tubatodd »

@arpthark
Image
Todd Morgan
Rudy Meinl 4/4 CC
Besson 995
Meinl Weston 2145
Mr. P 5.0
User avatar
bloke
Mid South Music
Posts: 24875
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 8:55 am
Location: western Tennessee - near Memphis
Has thanked: 5274 times
Been thanked: 6034 times

Re: York Master .750" BBb body/valveset poll

Post by bloke »

I would speculate that a moving that fourth circuit around to the front shouldn't be much more of a challenge than when some of us decide that that upward loop thing past a King 4th piston needs to be addressed in some manner (which either calls for a water key, or eliminating it with a dog leg heading downward).

sidebar:
On my 32-inch tall Holton build, the reason I decided to put a water key instead of a downward oriented dog leg was because the dog leg would have made the instrument thicker front to back (as a lower #4 slide would have had to pass over the #3 slide), and I was having fun with (the instrument already being very short) trying to see how thin I could make it front to back - in spite of it being front action.
Post Reply